Why does an AI recommend one business over another?
It is not a ranking and it cannot be bought. A model assembles the answer from whatever it can read about businesses in that area …
You ask the models the same questions on a schedule and record whether your business was named, on which platform, and in what position. That is the only direct measurement that exists. Everything else — traffic, impressions, rankings — is a proxy, and most AI visibility reporting sells proxies as results.
Most reporting in this category cannot be checked, which is the problem with it.
It is worth being blunt. A great deal of what is sold as AI visibility reporting cannot be checked: a score out of a hundred with no method, a graph that only goes up, or plain search metrics relabelled.
A measurement you cannot falsify is not a measurement. The test to apply to any provider, including us, is simple — can they show you the exact question asked, the exact answer that came back, the platform and the date? If not, you are being shown a proxy.
A measurement you cannot falsify is not a measurement.
An honest measurement moves in both directions. Ours does.
On the demo site we watch most closely, unbranded discovery citations went from 15.2% in May to 6.3% in August across an identical prompt set on identical models. We could have shown you the May number and stopped. Instead it is in the report, because a metric that only rises is a metric nobody is really taking.
What actually gets recorded, and why the two scores stay apart.
The exact prompt text, stored verbatim
The platform and model version it ran against
The full response, so the claim can be checked later
Whether the business was named, and where in the answer
Which other sources the model cited
The date, so change over time is visible
Collapsing them into one number is how this gets misleading, so they are reported apart.
Branded prompts ask about you by name and answer the verification question. Unbranded prompts ask an open question about the category and answer the discovery question. The first is winnable now; the second is much harder. A single blended figure hides exactly the thing you would want to know.
How the probe runs — and what it cannot see.
Each business gets a panel of prompts covering both shapes. That panel runs weekly against Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini, and each response is parsed for citations and stored whole.
The report goes to you by email and lives in your portal — including the questions you are losing, which is the part that tells you whether anything is actually working.
Two honest limits.
We cannot see private conversations. We measure what the models return to our probes, which is a sample, not a census of what your customers asked.
And attribution to revenue is indirect. We can show you were named more often; connecting that to a specific booked job needs your side of the story too.
Yes. Storing the whole response is the point — a citation count you cannot audit is just a claim.
Model answers move slowly and probing costs real money on every platform. Weekly catches change without spending your subscription on API calls.
Then you will see it, as we did. That is the difference between a report and a marketing dashboard.
Try it for 14 days. If it isn't what we said, we refund your first month in full and take the site down.